Christopher Bennage - All Comments

Valium tolerance.

Purchase valium. — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:05:18 GMT

Valium without prescription. Order valium online. Valium toxicity canine. Valium overnight. Side effects of valium. Valium appearance. Valium.

How much tramadol for daily use for dogs.

Cheapest tramadol. — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:28:09 GMT

Tramadol.

re: Building a WPF Application: Part 0

Ludovic — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:25:37 GMT

Cool, I'll be following your posts closely, as I've started writing WPF applications, and I still have to figure lots of things out. In case it's of any use to you, I also blogged a bit on the subject: http://ludovic.chabant.com/devblog/category/WPF.aspx

Building a WPF Application: Part 0

Christopher Bennage — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:16:31 GMT

In a rather indirect way, I was inspired by a commenter on one of Scott Hanselman's posts to begin

Building a WPF Application: Part 1

Community Blogs — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:46:13 GMT

I actually meant to say in my last post that I had investigated the API options for FriendFeed and they

Building a WPF Application: Part 1

DotNetKicks.com — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:56:40 GMT

You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com

re: Build a WPF Application: Part 0

Rene Rendon — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:14:24 GMT

I'm interested in seeing and would appreciate the effort. Still being new to DDD, more samples and WPF would be great.

re: Build a WPF Application: Part 0

Alan Le — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:12:46 GMT

Friendfeed is my current obsession. I've pretty much abandoned Witty. Lots of patches and stuff but I'm not motivated to do anything with Twitter atm. This project sounds interesting. I'll keep an eye out for your progress.

re: Build a WPF Application: Part 0

Brett Veenstra — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:25:49 GMT

Sounds like a great demo. Looking forward to seeing a TDD approach with a WPF UI motif.

re: Build a WPF Application: Part 0

Jon — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:14:26 GMT

I think it sounds like an awesome idea. In my (admittedly limited) experience I've gotten WPF info that takes one of two tracks: 1) I'm going to assume you know nothing about WPF and I'm going to show you the absolute beginnings. Look! This XML looking stuff, it's called XAML. Oooh! 2) I'm a WPF master and I'm going to wow you with my obscenely awesome, WPF ninja abilities. Bow before me! It would be nice to have something in between for those of us who aren't just starting but who aren't ninja-awesome either.

Dew Drop - July 21, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - July 21, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:03:45 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop - July 21, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - July 17, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

Dew Drop - July 17, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:29:43 GMT

Pingback from Dew Drop - July 17, 2008 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew

re: Using Lambdas to get at properties

Christopher Bennage — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:56:31 GMT

@Will, not very pretty actually. I wouldn't make it an extension for Brush, because it would further occlude the intent. You can make it an extension of Action<Brush>, but (as far as I understand) you can't call it inline on the lambda. In other words, you can't do this:

(b => Fill = b).SetBrush(style.FillBrush)

You'd have to do this:

Action<Brush> lambda = brush => Fill = brush;

lambda.SetBrush(style.FillBrush);

re: Using Lambdas to get at properties

Christopher Bennage — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:48:03 GMT

@Zack Thanks!

re: Using Lambdas to get at properties

Will — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:20:49 GMT

Nice. How would this look as an extension method?